binder-design-campaign
SolidGated protein design campaign: each expert judgement is a checkpoint a human signs off before compute is spent. Branches: de novo binder design (epitope choice, generation, co-folding ensemble ranking, ranked order sheet); structure and complex prediction with calibrated confidence; protein engineering (stability, enzyme, interface). Fires on designing binders or miniproteins, picking an epitope or hotspots, running RFdiffusion, BindCraft, BoltzGen, ProteinMPNN, ESMFold2 or Protenix, computing ipSAE or DockQ, ranking designs to order, auditing such a campaign, or 蛋白结合子设计, 表位选择, 结构预测.
Install
Quality Score: 83/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- SPYfighting
- Repository
- SPYfighting/my-academic-skills
- Created
- 3 weeks ago
- Last Updated
- 3 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
bioinformatics-sequence-design-checks
In-silico screening of designed constructs: specificity scoring, off-target checks, and documentation gates — always paired with institutional biosafety approval.
bioinformatics-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to perform custom bioinformatics analyses on genes or proteins that go beyond standard database lookups. This includes situations where existing domain/family annotations from UniProt are insufficient, when you need to verify dubious annotations, or when you need to perform comparative analyses across gene sets. The agent creates reproducible analysis pipelines with proper dependency management and documentation.
study-design-tool-gate
Classify a paper's study design (RCT, cohort, case-control, diagnostic-accuracy, systematic-review, animal-study, prediction-model, etc., or not_applicable) and dispatch to the correct downstream bias-risk/quality/reporting tool and specific variant (CASP has 8 variants, JBI ~6, RoB2 has parallel/cluster/crossover versions). Use this as the mandatory first step before running ANY of CASP, JBI, AMSTAR-2, NOS, RoB2, ROBINS-I, QUADAS-2, CONSORT, STROBE, ARRIVE, SPIRIT, TRIPOD, or engineering-config-grading — these tools are all study-design-conditional and picking the wrong variant produces meaningless results. It is entirely correct and common for this gate to determine that none of these medically-descended tools applies (e.g. most CS/ML papers) — that is a valid, complete answer, not a failure.