← ClaudeAtlas

academic-prose-auditlisted

Audit and revise drafted academic legal prose for propositional compression, mechanical sentence rhythm, and AI register, while preserving formal academic voice and OSCOLA conventions. Fixes the defect where too much meaning is left for the reader to reconstruct. Use this on any draft paper, response paper, seminar piece, or long note before submission, and whenever the user says a draft reads mechanically, sounds like AI, or needs humanising. Do NOT use for first drafts, exam answers, or casual chat.
Poisoneddiety/claude-skills-for-humanities · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 69
Install: claude install-skill Poisoneddiety/claude-skills-for-humanities
# Academic Prose Audit This skill fixes two distinct defects that get confused with each other. **Compression** is the serious one. The prose is accurate but too much is left for the reader to reconstruct: the actor is buried in a nominalisation, the middle term of an argument is missing, a citation stands where a sentence of reasoning should be. The reader can follow it only by doing work the writer should have done. **Mechanical register** is the cosmetic one. Em dashes, uniform sentence length, connective filler, and the vocabulary that marks text as machine-produced. Compression is the priority. A paragraph can be free of every AI tell and still be unreadable because its reasoning is elided. ## What this skill must not do The generic "humaniser" tools in circulation are built for blog and marketing copy, and applying them to a law paper degrades it. Protect the following, which those tools attack: **Hedging that reflects genuine doctrinal uncertainty stays.** "The position is unsettled" is accurate, not weak. Where the law genuinely admits of two readings, saying so is the honest move. Cut hedging only where it is decorative — stacked modals cancelling each other, or qualification attached to a proposition that is not in fact doubtful. **Formal register stays.** No contractions. No deliberate sentence fragments in body prose. No first-person plural exhortation. No manufactured "natural disfluency". The target is prose that reads as though a careful academic wrote