agri-deep-research

Solid

Deep research producing a fully written, source-validated literature review on an agricultural question, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline: scope, design the method, discover and screen by journal ranking, validate every source, extract and verify evidence, synthesize, stress-test, then write and format the review through an editorial and integrity loop. Same 12-subagent machinery as food-deep-research, grounded in agriculture and multidisciplinary literature (Q1/Q2 preferred, Q4 avoided). Use standalone for an agricultural deep dive, or as the engine called by agri-research. Triggers: deep research agriculture, investigate this agronomy question, agricultural literature review, state of the evidence in soil science, deep dive crop research.

AI & Automation 19 stars 2 forks Updated 4 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
43
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Agri-Deep-Research — Source-Validated Reviews for Agricultural Science **Run the `food-deep-research` skill exactly** — its 12-subagent team (`research_scope`, `research_architect`, `investigator`, `source_screener`, `source_verifier`, `bibliography`, `claim_verifier`, `synthesizer`, `critic`, `compiler`, `editor`, `ethics_reviewer`), both loops (evidence loop and compile↔review loop), and its source discipline — with the agriculture substitutions in [`agri-research/references/agriculture-domain.md`](../agri-research/references/agriculture-domain.md). Read that file first. No new machinery here. ## The substitutions 1. **Persona** — a **senior agricultural scientist of the specific discipline**; name it and apply its standards (domain §2). `research_architect` designs the method to that discipline's conventions. 2. **Evidence base** — `source_screener` ranks agriculture + multidisciplinary literature: **Tier 1** = Q1/Q2 of the seven agriculture categories ([`journals/_coverage_agriculture.md`](../journals/_coverage_agriculture.md)) + Nature/Science/Cell/PNAS + Q1/Q2 adjacent disciplines; **Tier 2** = Q3 for gaps; **Q4 avoided**. FAO/USDA/CGIAR/EFSA and extension sources are evidence with a source and date (domain §3). 3. **Journal routing** — `bibliography` and `compiler` format via `journal-selector` using the agriculture coverage map (domain §4); APA 7.0 by default. ## Source discipline (inherited, non-negotiable) Investigation and claim-checkin...

Details

Author
PangenomeAI
Repository
PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition
Created
2 weeks ago
Last Updated
4 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

agri-research

Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for agricultural science, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline (agronomy, soil science, horticulture, dairy and animal science, agricultural engineering, or agricultural economics). Same machinery as food-research, but the evidence base is agriculture and multidisciplinary literature ranked by journal quartile: Q1/Q2 agriculture journals plus the Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS families first, Q3 only for gaps, Q4 avoided. Use to research an agricultural topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, or scope a systematic review. Triggers: research this agricultural topic, agronomy literature review, soil science evidence synthesis, horticulture review, animal science evidence, crop research, farming systems review, what does the agricultural evidence say.

19 Updated 4 days ago
PangenomeAI
Code & Development Solid

food-deep-research

General-purpose deep research that produces a fully written, source-validated literature review on any question: scope it, design the method, discover and screen sources by journal ranking, validate every source, extract and verify evidence, synthesize, stress-test, then write and format the review (APA 7.0 by default, or a target journal's style) and polish it through an editorial + integrity review loop. Use standalone for a deep dive or literature review, or as the deep-dive engine called by food-research. Runs a 12-subagent team with iterate-to-saturation and compile↔review loops. Triggers: deep research, research this in depth, write a literature review, investigate thoroughly, comprehensive review, state of the evidence, briefing on, dig into, deep dive.

19 Updated 4 days ago
PangenomeAI
AI & Automation Solid

agri-pipeline

Master orchestrator for the whole agricultural research-to-publication workflow, run as a senior agricultural scientist. Coordinates the agri skills — journal selection, research (agri-research or agri-deep-research), writing and analysis (agri-paper), figures (food-figure), peer review (agri-review), revision and finalization — into one governed path with quality gates. Same machinery as food-pipeline, grounded in agriculture and multidisciplinary literature (Q1/Q2 preferred, Q4 avoided). Use when the user wants the entire agricultural process managed end to end. Triggers: run the full agricultural paper workflow, take my field trial from research to submission, manage my whole agronomy project, agricultural research to publication, end-to-end agriculture paper.

19 Updated 4 days ago
PangenomeAI