mini-program-verification-skill

Solid

Verify mini-program implementations and fixes with risk-calibrated evidence across static checks, unit tests, integration tests, state matrices, simulators, real devices, cloud environments, and release artifacts. Use when users ask to test, validate, accept, regression-check, quality-check, confirm readiness, or determine whether a mini-program feature is actually complete. Binds results to a source and build fingerprint, records commands and observable evidence, separates passed, failed, blocked, and not-run layers, prioritizes the next highest-information check, and never converts local success into device, cloud, release, or formal acceptance claims.

AI & Automation 59 stars 4 forks Updated 3 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
59
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
86
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /mini-program-verification-skill — 小程序工程验证 把“看起来完成”转成可复查的证据。先固定目标版本和风险,再逐层验证;已执行到哪一层,就只报告到哪一层。 ## 输入与版本指纹 - 接收功能目标、验收标准、实现/修复交接、项目事实图、复现入口和允许使用的环境。 - 验证前记录当前分支、提交或文件哈希、源码状态、构建产物标记、配置开关、工具/设备/云端环境与时间。 - 若工作区已有用户改动,先划分本轮目标与既有差异;不得清理、覆盖或把无关变化计入验证结论。 - 没有稳定验收行为时退回产品规格;根因未知的故障退回调试,不用随机测试代替定位。 ## 风险分层验证 1. 从用户目标、变更面、共享契约、数据/权限/外部服务和历史缺陷建立风险清单与验证矩阵。 2. 先运行低成本且能否定结论的检查,再按风险升级:静态检查、单元测试、集成测试、状态矩阵、真机验证、云端验证、发布验证。 3. 每项记录实际命令或步骤、退出码、样本/设备、观察结果和证据位置;只写“测过了”不构成证据。 4. 覆盖正常、空、错误、边界、重复操作、并发/乱序、恢复与回归;不为凑数量执行与风险无关的测试。 5. 失败时保存最小失败证据,区分产品不符合、实现缺陷、测试环境阻塞和证据缺失;不通过修改测试期望掩盖失败。 6. 使用 [证据可采信规则](references/evidence-admissibility.md) 记录产生工具、格式、版本、时间、环境/版本指纹、完整性、适用结论和不能证明的内容,并对每份证据给出 `admissible / limited / not-admissible` 质量标签;质量标签描述证据可采信程度,不与 `proven / not-proven` 等状态词混用或互相替代。 7. 对未知项目先运行套件提供的只读 capability doctor(若独立安装则执行同等只读探测),再按 [验证能力与适配矩阵](references/verification-capability-matrix.md) 复用现有能力;不自动安装或执行候选命令。 8. 使用 [质量证据矩阵](assets/quality-evidence-matrix.md) 记录包体/分包、启动/首屏、运行错误与发布后观察窗,并按 [验证工作流](references/verification-workflow.md) 和 [验证证据报告](assets/verification-evidence-report.md) 输出已执行、未执行和残余风险。 ## 状态与证据边界 - 静态检查或单元测试成功最多支持 `locally-verified`,不推出真机验证、云端验证或发布验证。 - 模拟器截图不是设备证据;真机证据需绑定机型、系统、微信版本、步骤和截图/日志。 - 云端证据需绑定环境、部署版本、真实请求与日志;本地桩不能替代。 - 构建成功不等于已上传;已上传不等于审核通过或正式发布。 - 自主验证不等于正式验收;没有用户明确确认时,报告“验证通过,待验收”,不写 `accepted`。 ## 最低输出 - 目标、范围、版本指纹、风险矩阵和验收行为。 - 各验证层的已执行命令/步骤、结果、证据位置与失败详情。 - 未执行、被阻塞和不适用项目,以及为什么未执行。 - 当前可支持的最高状态、残余风险、不可推出结论和下一项高信息量验证。 - 即使只评估截图转录或截断日志,也逐项输出采集工具、工具版本、时间、设备/环境、步骤、证据/构建指纹和...

Details

Author
NocodeMrLi
Repository
NocodeMrLi/mini-program-engineering-skill-suite
Created
4 weeks ago
Last Updated
3 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

mini-program-debugging-skill

Diagnose and fix mini-program failures through reproducible, evidence-driven root-cause analysis across source, state, asynchronous timing, caches, mock data, build versions, platform behavior, devices, cloud calls, and external services. Use when users report white screens, crashes, stale or jumping values, missing data, intermittent behavior, permission failures, performance stalls, device-only defects, API or cloud-function errors, source-versus-build mismatches, or regressions whose cause is not yet established. Freezes the observation environment, ranks competing hypotheses, runs discriminating checks, creates a failing regression test before repair, covers analogous states, and never hides a known failure with longer waits, swallowed errors, forced success, or cosmetic patches.

59 Updated 3 days ago
NocodeMrLi
AI & Automation Solid

mini-program-ui-device-skill

Design, preview, implement, and assess mini-program interfaces against an approved prototype, screenshot, visual reference, design system, or bounded UI request while preserving product semantics and existing accepted behavior. Use when users ask to reproduce a mini-program screen, refine visual hierarchy, adapt layouts across device sizes, handle safe areas or keyboards, inspect touch targets, scrolling, media, or gesture conflicts, compare an implementation with a reference, or prepare a device-verification matrix. Separates proposed visual previews, user approval, source integration, local checks, and real-device evidence; never invents product functionality for visual completeness or claims device validation without device-specific proof.

59 Updated 3 days ago
NocodeMrLi
AI & Automation Solid

wechat-mini-program-platform-skill

Analyze WeChat Mini Program platform constraints and evidence layers for an idea or existing repository, including source configuration, build output, WeChat DevTools loading, device behavior, permissions, privacy declarations, cloud or backend linkage, upload, trial, review, and production status. Use when users ask about WeChat-specific configuration, project roots, compile paths, capability permissions, privacy compliance, official platform rules, upload or release readiness, or why source and platform behavior differ. Performs read-only evidence classification by default, verifies time-sensitive or high-risk claims against current official WeChat sources, redacts identifiers and secrets, and never upgrades one evidence layer into another.

59 Updated 3 days ago
NocodeMrLi