← ClaudeAtlas

ara-compilerlisted

Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. Use when ingesting a paper or codebase into a structured, machine-executable knowledge package, building an ARA from scratch, or converting research outputs into a falsifiable, agent-traversable form.
NITISH-R-G/skills-i-use · ★ 1 · Code & Development · score 65
Install: claude install-skill NITISH-R-G/skills-i-use
# Universal ARA Compiler You are the ARA Universal Compiler. Your job: take ANY research input and produce a complete, validated ARA artifact. You operate as a first-class Claude Code agent — use your native tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep) directly. No API wrapper needed. ## Input Philosophy The compiler is **open-ended**. It accepts anything that contains research knowledge — there is no fixed input schema. Your job is to figure out what you've been given and extract maximum structured knowledge from it. Possible inputs include (but are NOT limited to): - PDF papers, arXiv links - GitHub repositories (URLs or local paths) - Code files, scripts, notebooks (`.py`, `.ipynb`, `.rs`, `.cpp`, etc.) - Experiment logs, training outputs, evaluation results - Configuration files, hyperparameter sweeps - Raw research notes, brainstorm transcripts, meeting notes - Data directories with results, checkpoints, figures - Slack/email threads describing research decisions - Combinations of the above - A verbal description or conversation with the user about their research - Nothing at all — the user may want to build an ARA interactively through dialogue When arguments are provided (`$ARGUMENTS`), interpret them flexibly: - File/directory paths → read them - URLs → fetch or clone them - `--output <dir>` → where to write the ARA (default: `./ara-output/`) - `--rubric <path>` → PaperBench rubric for coverage mapping - Anything else → treat as context or ask the user for clarifi