← ClaudeAtlas

wiki-ingestlisted

Use when ingesting a source (transcript, article, summary, meeting note) into an Obsidian-style llm-wiki, or maintaining one. Four modes: ingest (delegate to `summarizing-meetings`, upsert concept/entity pages additively, flag contradictions, update index.md and log.md), lint (orphans, dangling links, missing pages, contradictions), reindex (rebuild index.md from disk, preserve custom sections), query (keyword-find + cite). Triggers: ingest into wiki, register summary, lint, reindex, search notes, compound notes, llm-wiki.
MatrixFounder/Universal-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 77
Install: claude install-skill MatrixFounder/Universal-skills
# Wiki-Ingest — LLM-Wiki Maintenance Layer **Purpose**: Turn raw sources into nodes of a *compounding* knowledge base, not isolated summaries. Karpathy's llm-wiki pattern says: each new source must (a) get its own summary page AND (b) touch 10–15 other pages — concept pages, entity pages, the index, the log. `summarizing-meetings` already produces excellent single-file summaries; this skill is the *maintenance layer* that wires those summaries into a living wiki. The skill enforces three invariants: 1. **Raw layer is immutable** — sources are read, never modified. 2. **Wiki layer is LLM-owned and additive** — pages get richer over time, prior content is never silently overwritten. 3. **Every claim on a concept/entity page traces back to a source** via footnote citation. An auditable wiki at 50 ingests, not a noise pile. ## 1. Red Flags (Anti-Rationalization) **STOP and READ THIS if you are thinking:** - "I'll just create the summary, the user can update concepts themselves" → **WRONG**. That's exactly the maintenance burden llm-wiki is designed to remove. Without page upserts the `[[wiki-links]]` stay dangling and the vault never compounds. Always do the full ingest cycle. - "The existing concept page is short, I'll rewrite it cleaner" → **WRONG**. Concept pages are *additive*. You append new facts under existing ones with footnote citations. Rewriting destroys the audit trail and silently drops prior sources' contributions. - "These two facts disagree, I'll pick the newe