pivot-idealisted

Run the workflow in `workflows/pivot-optimization.md`. Arguments: $ARGUMENTS **If the user named a single variable to change** (pricing, audience, channel, platform, feature emphasis) - for example "what if I charged per client instead of per seat" - run the **Micro-pivot** path: skip weakness detection, generate exactly one option with `pivot_scope: micro` and `variables_changed: 1`, then re-score it. If that named change fails the Minimum Viable Pivot Criteria, say so plainly rather than substituting a different pivot. **Otherwise** run the standard chain: confirm the current score, detect weaknesses and their root causes, generate two or three options, and re-score the best one. Apply the Slug Rule when deciding where output lands. One variable changed updates the idea in place. Two variables, a change of `business_model`, or a change of the core problem creates `memory/ideas/<slug>-<pivot-word>/` with `pivot_of` set, and pauses the original with `superseded_by`. Only `addressable_weaknesses` are pivot targets. A knowledge gap means a dimension file is missing or thin; send it back to that research skill instead.