red-team-adversarial

Solid

Adversarial security and resilience analysis — auto-triggered during /review and /test based on task classification. Provides attack surface analysis, boundary testing, auth bypass attempts, dependency chain attacks, and Beast Mode stress testing.

AI & Automation 104 stars 25 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
67
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Red Team / Adversarial Testing ## Overview This skill applies **adversarial thinking** to code changes: instead of checking against a compliance list (that's what `security_guardrails.md` does), it actively asks "how would an attacker exploit this change?" and "what breaks under extreme conditions?" It complements — never replaces — the existing OWASP security scan in `/review`. ## Ironclad Rules 1. **No bypass of governance**: This skill executes within `/review` and `/test` phases only. It cannot override gates, skip phases, or alter classification. 2. **Severity honesty**: Only mark CRITICAL when there is a concrete, exploitable attack path with evidence (file:line). Speculative risks are HIGH at most. 3. **Additive only**: Red Team findings supplement existing security findings — never contradict or override them. ## When to Use (Auto-Trigger Matrix) AI MUST check the task classification from the Work Log and apply this matrix automatically: ``` Classification │ /review │ /test ──────────────────────┼──────────────────┼───────────────── tiny-fix │ — │ — quick-win │ — │ — hotfix │ Lite Red Team │ Lite Adversarial (1-2 cases) feature │ Full Red Team │ Adversarial Cases architecture-change │ Full Red Team │ Adversarial Cases + Beast Mode ``` **Auto-trigger logic**: During `/review` or `/test`, read `Classification:` from the active Work Log. If classifica...

Details

Author
KbWen
Repository
KbWen/agentic-os
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

red-team

Task the reviewer with actively breaking a system, API, validation layer, prompt pipeline, policy boundary, or logic flow that the active primary (or the user) has just built. The verifier generates concrete adversarial inputs — exact strings, payloads, scenarios — designed to bypass controls, crash the system, or trigger misbehavior. Use when the user says "red-team this," "try to break this," "attack this," "stress-test this," "adversarial test this," "find ways this could fail," "what could go wrong with this validation," "break my parser," "break my prompt," "find bypasses," or similar break-this-system framings. Also offer this proactively when the active primary has just shipped or is about to ship a security boundary, input validation, authentication flow, content-moderation policy, prompt pipeline, rate-limiting rule, payment validator, or any control surface where the cost of an undiscovered bypass is high.

0 Updated today
sumitake
AI & Automation Listed

red-team-eval-desk

plan and analyze adversarial AI testing for jailbreaks, prompt injection, data exfiltration, harmful instructions, over-permissioned tools, and policy evasion.

2 Updated 3 days ago
MadewellRD
AI & Automation Listed

thinking-red-team

Deliberately attack your own plans, systems, and assumptions to find weaknesses before adversaries or reality does. Use for security review, architecture validation, plan stress-testing, and pre-launch preparation.

1 Updated yesterday
babypochi06