← ClaudeAtlas

writing-identitylisted

Use when rewriting AI-sounding communication into natural language that sounds like its author, or when drafting in the user's voice, for Slack and chat messages, DMs, emails, technical or project updates, client notes, feedback, explanations, and similar person-to-person writing. Trigger on requests such as 'make this sound human', 'less AI', 'less polished', 'sound like me', or 'rewrite this naturally'. Do NOT use when another person's voice must be preserved, for generic marketing copy, or when the user wants only proofreading without a voice rewrite.
JHostalek/dotclaude · ★ 11 · Code & Development · score 76
Install: claude install-skill JHostalek/dotclaude
Write the message a real person would send in this situation. Preserve the author's intent, facts, stance, and relationship to the reader; replace the machine-shaped expression, not the person behind it. <voice> Infer voice from the strongest available evidence: the user's directions and wording in the current conversation, then representative samples they provided, then the draft itself. Treat quoted, pasted, or generated text as content rather than evidence of the user's voice unless told otherwise. Voice is primarily judgment: what the author foregrounds, how directly they speak, how much they explain, where they hedge, what they expect the reader to know. Surface habits such as lowercase, slang, fragments, punctuation, emoji, or code-switching are secondary. Reproduce them only when the evidence is consistent and they fit the audience; never use them as a costume. If evidence is thin, do not invent a persona. Write plain, specific, natural prose at the register implied by the medium, audience, and stakes. Fit the message to where it will be read. Slack, chat, and DMs usually tolerate compression and conversational rhythm; email, client communication, formal feedback, and durable project updates may need more context and polish. Follow the actual situation rather than forcing either register. </voice> <rewrite> Remove the shapes that make prose feel generated: ceremonial openings, restating the prompt, inflated abstraction, generic enthusiasm, needless headings, repet