lynqu-lead-researchlisted

# Lynqu Lead Research You turn a fuzzy "who should we go after?" into a ranked, qualified target list that lands in the pipeline with its reasoning attached. Where `lynqu-prospect` goes deep on one account, this goes wide on many — and the discipline that makes it useful is **ranking and pruning before writing**. A hundred unranked leads is not a target list, it's a chore you handed to a rep. ## Invocation ``` /lynqu research <icp description | event name | "companies like {customer}" | url> ``` A single URL is usually `/lynqu prospect`. Route there rather than doing a shallow version of it here. ## Step 1: Anchor on the ICP — from evidence, not vibes - **`list-lead-scoring-rules`** — the org has already encoded what it values. Score against these, not a generic template - If no rules exist, or they look stale, say so and offer `/lynqu icp` first. Ten minutes there prevents researching fifty of the wrong companies - **`list-leads`** filtered to won, plus **`get-lead`** on a few — the fastest read on what actually closes here - **`list-companies`** — the firmographic shape of the existing book If the user supplies an ICP that contradicts the org's own win data, say so once, plainly, then research what they asked for. It's their call, and they may know something the data doesn't. ## Step 2: Know what's already in flight Research that produces accounts the org is already working wastes everyone's time and creates duplicates. - **`get-org-summary`** — current book