delivery-readiness-audit

Solid

Spot-check AC internal consistency and scan for pending revisions on delivery-ready stories. Activated by `/gaai-status --audit` as Section 5. Complements the standard status checks with depth checks that standard status skips for speed.

AI & Automation 160 stars 27 forks Updated today NOASSERTION

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
73
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Delivery Readiness Audit ## Purpose / When to Activate Activate via `/gaai-status --audit`. This skill runs **after** the standard status sections (1–4) have already identified delivery-ready stories, memory staleness, and framework health. This skill adds two depth checks that standard status skips for speed: - **AC internal consistency** — catches missing columns, undeclared endpoints, broken cross-references within a story - **Pending revisions** — catches deferred work flagged in backlog notes but not yet captured as stories --- ## Process ### 1. AC internal consistency — spot-check READY stories For each story identified as "ready to deliver" by Section 1: 1. Open the story artefact file 2. Build an inventory of all resources **declared** by schema/setup ACs: columns, tables, endpoints, queues, secrets, cron triggers 3. Scan all other ACs for resources **referenced** but not in the inventory 4. Flag any reference to a column, endpoint, queue, table, or resource that is not declared elsewhere in the same story **Example of what this catches:** - AC5 uses `orders.cancelled_at` for filtering, but AC4 (schema migration) doesn't list that column - AC7 references `users.api_token` but it's missing from the migration Severity: CRITICAL if it would cause the Delivery Agent to produce incomplete code. ### 2. Pending revisions scan Scan all backlog item `notes` fields for patterns indicating unresolved work: **Patterns to match:** - "will be revised", "pending revis...

Details

Author
Fr-e-d
Repository
Fr-e-d/GAAI-framework
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
NOASSERTION

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

readiness-audit

Audit a surface against a checklist to answer 'is it clean/legal/consistent to ship for THIS event?' — the recurring sibling of /foundational-review. Parallel exploration per surface, controller re-verification of every load-bearing claim, then tiered evidence-celled findings and a phased remediation plan (findings triage to phases, NOT a shipping list). Read-only probes only. No irreversible-decision anchor required (contrast /foundational-review). Triggers: '/readiness-audit <scope-root> --for "<event>"', '/audit-ready', 'readiness audit', 'release-readiness audit', 'is this ready to ship/publish/hand over', 'public-release audit'. (Code port — ADR-094.)

17 Updated today
mikeprasad
AI & Automation Listed

release-audit

Release & supply-chain readiness audit: gathers evidence from real workflows, manifests, and repo settings, compares against a gold-standard reference stack, has an adversarial subagent try to refute the draft, and returns a prioritized action plan (P1–P3) whose fixes are delegated to the sibling setup skills. Use when asked to audit release automation, publishing security, CI or supply-chain maturity, or whether a repo is ready to release. For a whole-repo health check (docs, tests, code quality) use maturity-analysis instead.

0 Updated 3 weeks ago
emaarco
AI & Automation Listed

pm-ai-ship-audit

AI 生成代码的上线前审计技能(vibe-coded app 交付审计)。两个方法 + 五条流程: 「文档基线」(架构、用户与权限流、权限矩阵、变量与密钥、测试覆盖地图,外加邮件/定时任务/SEO/内嵌 Agent 四个条件文档)、 「意图 vs 实现」(找文档写了但代码没做到的差距——通用扫描器发现不了的那一类 bug); 流程含反向补文档、推导测试覆盖、静态安全审计、静态性能审计(专抓 N+1 与请求瀑布)、上线检查总装。 能力:(1) 给 AI 写出来的代码补齐可评审的文档基线 (2) 交叉核对文档意图与代码实现的差距 (3) 出带证据行(file:line + 原文片段)且经过自我反驳的审计报告。 触发词:「上线前检查」「AI 代码审计」「vibe coding 检查」「代码和文档对不上」「权限有没有漏」 「安全审计」「性能审计」「N+1」「请求瀑布」「补系统文档」「测试覆盖地图」「ship check」, 或者用户说「这个项目是 AI 写的,能上线吗」时。 不适用:常规代码评审 → /code-review(Claude Code 内置,Codex/Cursor 无此技能);架构与详细设计文档 → hld-design / lld-design; 测试用例设计 → pm-test-cases;系统性排障 → systematic-debugging。 参考文档为英文原文,产出语言跟随用户提问语言。

1 Updated yesterday
iDWong