business-frameworkslisted
Install: claude install-skill Faaz17/Agents-and-Skills
# Business frameworks — applying them for marks
## The trap that caps a grade
Most capstone projects apply frameworks **descriptively**: a PESTLE table, a Five Forces
diagram, a SWOT box, then the narrative moves on as if the framework were a box ticked.
That is a Pass. It demonstrates recall, not analysis.
Distinction-level use has four properties:
1. **Selective** — you chose this framework because it answers a specific question, and you
say which. Three frameworks used well beat seven used shallowly.
2. **Evidenced** — every cell carries a cited data point, not an assertion. "Rivalry is
high" is worthless; "the top four operators hold X% of UAE CEP volume (Source, 2025),
and FedEx's international yield fell Y% in FY2024 (FedEx Corporation, 2024), indicating
price-led rivalry" is analysis.
3. **Consequential** — the output changes a decision in the business plan. If the PESTLE
does not alter the market-entry choice, cut it or make it matter.
4. **Critiqued** — you know the framework's limits and say so where relevant.
**Test every framework you include:** if you deleted it, would any decision in the plan
change? If no, it is decoration. Cut it.
## Choosing the framework
| Question | Framework |
|---|---|
| What macro-forces shape this market and its timing? | PESTLE |
| How attractive is this industry, and where does profit accumulate? | Porter's Five Forces |
| What is the incumbent's defensible advantage — and where is it soft? | VRIO, Value Chain |