kim-ccf-research-integritylisted

# CCF Integrity Auditor ## Core Rule Trace each important claim to supplied evidence, each number to supplied results, and each citation to a real cited work and a supported citation context. Mark unsupported items instead of repairing them by invention. ## Modes - `claim-audit`: claim-support and result-to-claim consistency. - `numeric-audit`: numbers, units, table/figure/text agreement, deltas, and metric direction. - `citation-audit`: already cited papers, BibTeX metadata, duplicate keys, DOI/arXiv/venue sanity, and citation-context support. - `full`: all integrity checks. ## Workflow 1. Identify supplied manuscript, figures/tables/results, bibliography, `ccfa.yaml`, and requested audit mode. 2. Build a claim-evidence matrix and mark each claim as supported, partially supported, unsupported, overstated, or unclear. 3. Cross-check all reported values across text, tables, figures, captions, abstracts, and conclusions. 4. For citation audit, verify only existing citations unless the user asks for new literature; broad search belongs to `ccf-literature-searcher`. 5. For any questionable citation, separate metadata problems from context-support problems. 6. Hand off to `ccf-paper-reviewer` for full scientific judgment and to `ccf-paper-writer` for safe wording edits. 7. If the numbers and claims are consistent but the figure/table layout, caption placement, palette, float order, or rendered readability is weak, hand off to `ccf-visual-composer`. ## Output Contract ```te