food-chain-code

Solid

Adversarial architecture stress-tester. Selects attacker agents from a code-specific behavioral DNA library matched to the technical decision. Each attacks under strict role-lock. Weakest eliminated, survivor absorbs and evolves. Tests architecture decisions before a line of code is written. Works in Claude.ai, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot with no dependencies.

AI & Automation 3 stars 0 forks Updated 2 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
20
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Food Chain Code Adversarial architecture stress-tester. Each agent attacks a technical decision from a distinct failure vector under strict role-lock. Weak arguments are eliminated each round. Survivors absorb and evolve. The architecture patches itself. One apex predator remains — and the design that survived it is the design worth building. --- ## What This Is The only adversarial skill built for software architecture decisions, not product validation. It produces structural insights a single-pass review cannot — because each attacker operates in isolation, the elimination mechanic forces genuine technical pressure, and the architecture is stress-tested against its evolved version in every subsequent round. Use it before writing code, not after. ## What This Is Not - A code review tool. This attacks architecture decisions, not implementations. - A brainstorming tool. The architecture must already be proposed. Use a design skill first if not. - A product validation tool. For product ideas, use `food-chain-ideation`. - A benchmarking tool. It does not measure performance — it predicts structural failure. - A linter or static analysis replacement. Those catch bugs. This catches regret. --- ## Prerequisites Read `references/code-animal-library.md` before designing any ecosystem. Use the Quick Selection Guide at the top of that file to identify candidate animals fast. Never invent behavioral traits from scratch. Never select animals whose failure vectors overlap. Chec...

Details

Author
CodedRichy
Repository
CodedRichy/food-chain-ideation
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

food-chain-ideation

10-minute pre-ship stress-test. Run this before you ship, not instead of shipping. Dynamically selects animal agents from a behavioral DNA library matched to the specific problem, each attacking under strict role-lock with zero shared context. Weakest eliminated each round, survivor absorbs the insight and evolves, idea patches itself until one apex predator stands. Quick mode (5 animals, 1 round) for fast verdicts. Full mode for high-stakes decisions. Works in Claude.ai, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, and any agent with no dependencies.

3 Updated 2 days ago
CodedRichy
AI & Automation Solid

food-chain-pitch

Investor pitch stress-tester. Spawns adversarial agents from a pitch-specific behavioral DNA library. Each attacks the pitch narrative, financial model, or due diligence surface under strict role-lock. Elimination rounds harden the pitch. Works in Claude.ai, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot with no dependencies.

3 Updated 2 days ago
CodedRichy
AI & Automation Solid

design-architecture

Reviews the current codebase architecture and proposes improvements using four parallel specialist subagents: System Architect, Software Architect, Data Architect, and an Adversarial Architect that red-teams failure paths, LLM adversarial output scenarios, silent corruption risks, and invariant bypasses. Each subagent independently analyzes the codebase from their domain perspective, then their findings are consolidated into a living `architecture.md` file with a tracked to-do list and change log. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or improve the architecture — or when they ask questions like "what should we change structurally?", "how is the system organized?", "what are our architecture problems?", "can you do an architecture review?", or "let's redesign X". Also trigger when the user mentions technical debt, structural improvements, security concerns, failure modes, vulnerabilities, or wants a second opinion on design decisions, even if they don't use the word "architecture".

71 Updated 1 weeks ago
SenolIsci