repo-explorer

Solid

Explore and analyze any repository (local path or remote GitHub/GitLab URL) by delegating to Claude Code CLI (`claude -p`) in non-interactive mode with read-only access. Use when the user asks to explore, analyze, investigate, or research a repository or codebase. Triggers on "explore repo", "analyze repo", "investigate repo", "research codebase", "what does this repo do", "how does this codebase work", "ask about repo", "codebase question", "explore repository", "what API does this project have", "analyze this GitHub repo", "explore https://github.com/...", or any request to understand a repository's structure, API, architecture, or implementation details. Works with both local paths and remote URLs (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket).

AI & Automation 110 stars 8 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
68
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Repo Explorer Launch a separate Claude Code CLI process (`claude -p`) with read-only tools to explore a repository and answer questions about it. Supports both local repositories and remote URLs. ## Workflow ### 1. Determine repo source, question, and model From the user's message extract: - **source**: one of: - **local path** (`~/projects/foo`, `/opt/services/bar`, `.` or omitted = cwd) - **remote URL** (`https://github.com/owner/repo`, `git@github.com:owner/repo.git`) - **shorthand** (`owner/repo` — treat as `https://github.com/owner/repo`) - **question**: what to find out about the repository. - **model** — pick by task type, not by habit: - **`haiku`** — mechanical lookup, where the answer is *located* in the code and just needs finding: "what endpoints exist", "where is X defined", "list the migrations", structure inventory, "does this repo use Y". - **`sonnet`** — analytical work, where the answer must be *judged*, not just found: "what can we learn/borrow from this repo", applicability assessment, design/architecture review, comparing approaches, security analysis, "what's original here", trade-off summaries. Cue words: оцени, что полезного, идеи, применимость, review, compare, learn from. - A cheap model on an analytical question produces shallow results with flattened nuances that cost more to verify than the tokens saved — this rule exists because it happened. - An explicit user request ("use haiku", "запусти sonnet", op...

Details

Author
CodeAlive-AI
Repository
CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category