← ClaudeAtlas

negotiation-position-plannerlisted

Turns a list of open points from a negotiation — unresolved clauses in a draft, a term sheet's open items, or issues the user supplies directly — into an opening position, a fallback, and a walk-away line for each point, tied to the client's actual priorities and their alternative to a deal. Use this whenever a user wants strategy for the negotiating room rather than clause wording or a risk grading — including phrasings like "help me plan the negotiation on these open points", "what should our opening position be on the indemnity cap", "where can we afford to give ground here", "build a fallback position for each issue", or "what's our walk-away line if they won't move on exclusivity". Distinct from redline-proposer, which drafts the wording — this plans the strategy behind it. Fires whenever a negotiation has multiple open points to sequence and trade against each other.
Cancellationperiplocagraeca503/legal-ai-skills · ★ 2 · AI & Automation · score 75
Install: claude install-skill Cancellationperiplocagraeca503/legal-ai-skills
# Negotiation Position Planner ## What this does Takes the open points in a negotiation and builds a position for each one — an opening ask, a fallback the client should genuinely be prepared to accept, and the point past which the deal no longer serves the client better than walking away — set inside a single plan that says which points can be traded against which and in what order to raise them. It does not draft clause wording; that is redline-proposer's job. It does not grade legal risk in isolation; that is contract-reviewer's. This skill turns a list of issues into a plan for the room. ## Before you start **The client's actual priorities across the open points, not just their positions.** Which points are must-win, which are genuinely negotiable, and which the client would give away entirely for something else. This is the single most important input: a plan built on an unranked list cannot sequence trades correctly, and legal risk severity is not the same axis as negotiating priority — a Critical legal exposure might still be tradeable if the commercial upside elsewhere is large enough, and a Minor drafting point might matter disproportionately to the client for reasons outside the document. If the user has not ranked the points, ask; do not substitute your own assessment of what should matter to them. **The client's alternative if no deal is reached — their walk-away option.** Whether that is another counterparty, doing without, or no real alternative at all. Thi