← ClaudeAtlas

arbitral-award-analystlisted

Reads an arbitral award and produces a neutral map of jurisdiction, issues, findings, reasoning, operative relief, interest, costs, compliance dates, corrections, and enforcement dependencies. Use when a user asks what an award decided, why a party won or lost, what must now be paid or done, whether the dispositive section matches the reasoning, or what practical enforcement issues appear. Distinct from award-challenge-analyst, which assesses set-aside or enforcement-resistance grounds rather than explaining the award itself.
Cancellationperiplocagraeca503/legal-ai-skills · ★ 2 · AI & Automation · score 75
Install: claude install-skill Cancellationperiplocagraeca503/legal-ai-skills
# Arbitral Award Analyst ## Purpose Explain exactly what the award decided and what follows from it, separating the tribunal's holdings from party submissions, factual background, inference, and later legal assessment. ## Required inputs Obtain the complete signed award, all separate or dissenting opinions, correction or interpretation decisions, relevant procedural orders, arbitration agreement, applicable rules, and any known enforcement or challenge context. Ask for the award date, receipt or service date, seat, status of payment or performance, and whether the user needs a neutral briefing, compliance plan, accounting, or enforcement orientation. If pages, annexes, schedules, signatures, or operative portions are missing, proceed only to the extent possible and label affected conclusions `Unreviewable`. ## Method 1. Classify the decision: final, partial, interim, consent, costs, correction, interpretation, or other. Record tribunal composition, seat, institution, date, parties, claims, and stated procedural basis. 2. Build an issue-disposition matrix. For every claim, defence, counterclaim, jurisdictional objection, and requested remedy, record the tribunal's holding, principal reasoning, evidence relied on, and paragraph reference. 3. Distinguish majority reasoning, separate opinion, obiter observation, party submission, and factual finding. Do not attribute a submission to the tribunal as a finding. 4. Reconcile the reasons with the dispositive section. Flag omit