strategy-stakes-review

Solid

Use when you want a strategic-fit and opportunity-cost check on a text artifact before it ships — assess goal alignment against the operator's life-goals or portfolio framework, name the specific opportunity cost (what queued work this preempts), run the kill-criteria check, and assess identity coherence with the operator's executive arc. Encodes the Strategy & Stakes deliberator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. Use standalone for fast strategic check, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills.

AI & Automation 9 stars 1 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
33
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Purpose Read a text artifact as a portfolio manager reads a position — not "is this good?" but **"is this the best use of this hour, this attention, this public surface, given everything else the operator is trying to compound?"** The artifact arrives optimized for itself. It survived the operator's own gate. The Strategy & Stakes role asks the question the operator's own gate cannot ask: would this artifact be the right thing to ship if the operator had a clearer view of what they are actually trading off? The role is not a brake. It is a portfolio overlay. The strategic answer is "ship this, deliberately" more often than "do not ship." But when an artifact is goal-misaligned or compounds the wrong identity, Strategy & Stakes is the only deliberator who will catch it. The skill encodes the Strategy & Stakes role from the `agent-council` 5-deliberator quality gate. Use standalone for fast strategic check, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills for fuller coverage. ## When to Use / When NOT to Use **Use this skill when:** - You have a draft Tier-1 artifact and want to confirm it serves the highest-leverage goal before spending the publish hour on it - You suspect opportunity cost is high (some queued work would compound more than this artifact) and want it named - You want to surface identity-coherence risk — does this artifact match the operator's executive arc, or does it drift into a positioning the operator does not actually hold? - Kill-criteria are commi...

Details

Author
Avyayalaya
Repository
Avyayalaya/agent-council
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

skeptic-review

Use when you want an adversarial steelman pass on a text artifact before it ships — surface the load-bearing claims, the strongest unaddressed counter-position, the top failure modes, and any causality-vs-correlation gaps. Encodes the Skeptic deliberator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. Use standalone for fast structural critique, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills (voice-identity-review, evidence-calibration-review, strategy-stakes-review, adjudicator-synthesis) to run a Council-style review without spinning up the full Python CLI.

9 Updated 1 weeks ago
Avyayalaya
Code & Development Solid

voice-identity-review

Use when you want a line-level voice and identity audit on a text artifact before it ships — surface specific voice-rule violations (banned patterns, hype words, register mismatches), apply the CXO test, and check identity coherence with the operator's voice corpus and persona DNA. Encodes the Voice & Identity deliberator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. Use standalone for fast voice critique, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills to run a Council-style review without spinning up the full Python CLI.

9 Updated 1 weeks ago
Avyayalaya
AI & Automation Solid

critic

Tool-grounded Critic skill (layered eval architecture, Layer 2). Dispatched as a subagent on high-stakes outputs. Grounds the verdict against tool-fetched evidence, not self-reflection. Returns SHIP / SHIP_WITH_FIXES / BLOCK with fixes + reason + confidence. Pairs with the stake classifier (Layer 1) and branching-workflow (Layer 3). Used by content drafts, regulatory-style takes, partner outreach drafts, and proposals.

3 Updated today
0xUrsanomics