mllm-eval

Featured

Design or audit a model-agnostic evaluation harness for an LLM or multimodal LLM on a clinical task (radiology report generation, visual question answering, clinical text extraction/classification) — the adjudicated reference standard, clinical-efficacy metrics (RadGraph-F1 / CheXbert-F1 beyond BLEU/ROUGE), faithfulness and hallucination, pretraining-contamination of public benchmarks, prompt-sensitivity and determinism, answer-matching, and a reader study — and gate the plan for those axes. Works on a closed API or open weights. Never fabricates outputs or scores, and never reports n-gram overlap as clinical correctness.

AI & Automation 220 stars 55 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
78
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# MLLM-Eval Skill ## Purpose This skill makes an **LLM / MLLM clinical evaluation defensible**: a real adjudicated reference standard, faithfulness measured not assumed, clinical-efficacy metrics beyond n-gram overlap, a pretraining- contamination check, prompt-sensitivity disclosed, and a reader study where text is generated. It is **model-agnostic** — every check applies to a closed API and to open weights — and **read-only** (an advisory design/audit skill): it audits the evaluation design and **specifies and routes** the clinical-efficacy metrics (RadGraph-F1 / CheXbert-F1 via their published extractors) rather than running the model or computing the metrics itself. It is the LLM/MLLM **evaluation-design counterpart** in the lane — an auditor that hands the specified metrics to their extractors and `/analyze-stats`, parallel to how `/model-validation` audits an imaging model's design (the imaging metrics themselves are computed by `/model-evaluation`). The reviewer-side audit of a finished manuscript uses the `mllm_evaluation.md` (ME0–ME8) probe via `/self-review` and `/peer-review`; this skill is the author-side harness design. It routes the reader study to `/design-ai-benchmarking`, the sizing to `/calc-sample-size`, and TRIPOD-LLM / MI-CLEAR-LLM compliance to `/check-reporting`. ## When to use - You are designing or auditing an evaluation of an LLM/MLLM on a clinical task and want it to cover the axes a reviewer will check (reference standard, faithfulness, conta...

Details

Author
Aperivue
Repository
Aperivue/medsci-skills
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category