deep-review
FeaturedParallel competency-based code review. Launches independent Agent reviewers per competency (security, performance, architecture, database, concurrency, error-handling, frontend, testing), each with a focused checklist and isolated context. Synthesizes findings into unified report with FIX/DEFER/ACCEPT triage. Use when: "deep review", "thorough review", "parallel review", "review by competency", "full code review", or for large diffs (200+ lines) where /review may be too shallow. Complements /review (pre-landing) — this is for deep dives. Do NOT use just to orient in an unfamiliar codebase or get a structural symbol overview; use repo-map for that (this audits a concrete diff for defects, it is not a navigation map).
Install
Quality Score: 90/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- AnastasiyaW
- Repository
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
review-full
Run a comprehensive multi-perspective code review on recent changes. Also triggers on 'is this secure?', 'security review', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'could this be exploited?' for security-focused review. Produces: GO/NO-GO verdict + findings table (Severity | Category | File:Line | Issue | Recommendation) grouping CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW across code quality (patterns, error handling, types), security (OWASP Top 10, auth gaps, hardcoded secrets), and database logic (N+1 queries, soft-delete violations, missing models).
deep-review
Use this skill before committing significant changes, after a refactor, or when you want a second opinion on a diff — not for auditing a third-party skill/plugin's safety before install (use /ievo:security-check for that). Structured 11-point gap-detection review of a diff before commit. Spawns a deep-reviewer subagent for independent eyes (fresh context, separate token budget). Catches issues that survive pre-commit hooks, linters, and test suites but surface in human PR review — completeness gaps, test/impl drift, dead code from partial refactors, naming/behaviour mismatch, doc-paraphrase drift, cross-file consistency, error-path coverage, API contract fidelity, security surface, concurrency/state, and leaked secrets. Supports scope modes — staged changes (default), working tree, or arbitrary git range.