brand-protectionlisted

# Brand Protection Scan the domain landscape around a brand, evaluate each similar registration individually, and surface unconfirmed defensive candidates. **Registration is not infringement.** A domain matching a typosquat pattern is a structural similarity, not proof of abuse. Many such domains are legitimate (common words, unrelated businesses, the brand's own portfolio). This skill surfaces domains worth reviewing. It does not determine legality or intent. Use neutral language ("registered variant", "matches pattern") throughout. ## Tools **Core:** `typosquat` (requires full domain), `nrds`, `tld_check`, `monitor`, `preferences`, `usage`, `safety` **Supporting (per-domain, conditional):** `whois`, `dns`, `available`, `bulk_available` ## Input - Domain (e.g. `acmebank.com`): prefix = brand term, domain used directly for `typosquat`. - Keyword only (e.g. `acme`): use for `nrds` and `tld_check`. Ask user to confirm primary domain before calling `typosquat`. Do not guess. ## Evidence rules - `typosquat` returns variants with an optional `registered_date`. WITH `registered_date` = confirmed registered. WITHOUT = unknown status (not "available", not confirmed registered). For unknown-status variants worth investigating, call `whois` or `available` to resolve. - `prefix_tld_count` is a current count, not a time series. Cannot prove bulk registration alone. - `tld_check` returns `might_available`, not confirmed availability. Verify with `available` or `bulk_available` be